MozillaZine

IE5.5: First Look

Friday December 3rd, 1999

I've done some preliminary CSS testing of IE5.5 (available through Betanews.com). Specifically I ran IE 5.5 through the battery of David Baron's CSS tests, and found some interesting results. IE 5.5's CSS support has undergone very little change from 5.0, and some regressions were noticable. IE 5.5 seems to pass test 5.3 (CSS2 Universal Selector) that IE 5.0 did not, but it fails two tests in section 6.4.4 (Parsing Test 4 and Test 5) that IE 5.0 apparently passed. There was one other that *may* have passed (9.1.2) where 5.0 failed, and one test in 10.7 *may* have failed where 5.0 passed, but I can't determine these for a certainty. Finally, IE 5.5 still does not pass the Box Acid Test.

According to MS's "What's New in Internet Explorer 5.5" page, IE 5.5 handles more "CSS styles" such as first-letter and first-line, but they don't go into any more detail.

From these results, I'm wondering if MS is giving up completely on significant advances in the CSS support in their current rendering engine. IE on the Mac is supposedly being developed to utilize a new rendering engine, codename "Tasman". Maybe Microsoft is planning something similar for their 6.0 Windows version.

In any event it does not look like the next version of IE will have significant CSS improvements as many hoped and expected.


#45 HA HAA *nelson* (MS Bashing is such a waste.....)

by stoecker <stoecker@mindrevolution.de>

Saturday December 4th, 1999 12:20 AM

You are replying to this message

get a life, kid! Microsoft never ever invetend anything, they just steal ideas, technology and even code (reverse engineering, that is!) - but then the products just don't progress any more. They don't have own ideas and only polish up interfaces and effects. Never technology.

Mozilla or not, Linux or not, BeOs or not, StarOffice or not - in the (near?!) future Microsoft will kill itself (!!) because users will (hopefully) demand progressive and advanced technology. MS is not able to provide that. Period.