Vote For Your Favorite Bugs!
Thursday October 7th, 1999
Have a Mozilla bug that you really want fixed? You can now vote for your most important bugs, and the Mozilla managers will tally the votes. (We don't have more information about what will occur with the totalled votes, but we assume the bugs will the highest votes will be given a higher priority).
#8 It's not a bug, it's a feature!
Friday October 15th, 1999 10:08 AM
You are replying to this message
Re Bug 991, it can be argued that Mozilla's current (non)support is actually correct. By the specs, it's invalid to put block-level elements within character-level ones. As something of a "purist" myself, I wouldn't mind seeing some of the "presentationalist" pages created with invalid HTML by designers who arrogantly say "Well, the browsers support it, so I don't care what the standards say!" start breaking in a new browser that supports the standards better. If designers have to fix all their pages, it might teach them to follow the specs better.
As for what "bugs" I'd like to see addressed, my votes are for:
#1061, #16206: Better support for <Q> element, with "curly quotes" and smart treatment of nested quotes.
#2800: Smart use of LINK elements.
(These aren't really "bugs", per se, but they *are* important areas of standards compliance that are noted in "Bugzilla".)