Mac Needs an Alternative to Mozilla?
Monday August 30th, 1999
Apparently there is a bit of dissension in the Mac ranks over the state of Mozilla on their platform. According to one post at MacDiscussion, Mozilla is called "less than desirable in terms of the resources it uses and the general speed of the browser". Another post describes an average start time of 3.5 minutes (it should be noted that this is on a slower machine - a 180Mhz 604e). This is surprising to me, because this isn't the case on the Windows platform. If Mozilla actually is slow on the Mac, does anyone know why? Are these issues being addressed? I'm usually wary of posting comments like these so early in the development process, but these experiences run contrary to my experience with Mozilla, and I'm curious to know if others have the same issues on the Mac.
Thanks to George for this news.
#4 Very slow with Virtual Memory on my iMac
Tuesday August 31st, 1999 7:34 AM
You are replying to this message
M9 Release is very slow on my 32Mb RAM iMac. This is the first version that I'm trying on a Mac. All other versions are tested and evaluated at work on a Windows NT 450 Mhz Pentium II.
The current Mac build takes 12Mb of precious RAM! Hence, my HD disk is spinning like a devil!
Yes, I know, I need more memory!