MozillaZine

MozillaZine's ChromeZone Now Open!

Monday May 24th, 1999

Steve Morrison, creator of the XULTool, has joined MozillaZine (as some of you may already know). He has been hard at work getting the XULTool working on our site, and we're pleased to announce that the ChromeZone is now online.

Now, with a simple form, you can change the look and feel of Mozilla, and create your own themes! You can also choose from some ready-made themes we have available. You can also send your own themes to ChromeZone for addition to our site.

So, fire up apprunner and head over to the chromeZone.

We got a lot of great entries for our little "name our new chrome area" contest, but in our final vote, "ChromeZone" came out on top. A number of people submitted the name "ChromeZone" or a variation for our contest. Clayton Scott was the first, however, and his prize is a stuffed Mozilla doll from Netscape. I know we didn't promise any prizes for the contest, but we wanted to give something to the winner.

Thanks to everyone for you contributions, and if you have any suggestions for the chromeZone, let us know.


#268 Re:MozillaZine's ChromeZone Now Open!

by mozineAdmin

Tuesday June 1st, 1999 9:50 AM

You are replying to this message

MSNAssKisser,

My posts abide by the rules I set down, which is that I do not attack with namecalling, and my posts are not void of content. These are not games, and I do not attack you personally, I attack your comments - which are utterly lacking any supporting facts. Everyone's comments are fair game in this forum. And I'm not opting out of responding in these forums simply because you don't like what I have to say.

You attempt "with all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about" posts even with the likes of Dave Hyatt, who is one of Netscape's major developers in charge of the cross-platform front-end. And yet, even when attacking my post for being an "attack", you brush off my supposed lack of knowledge by saying "A developer should already know the difference between a UI that's resolved at compile time versus runtime with no need for further explanation... obviously, that tells me more about you."

If that's not a scurrilous remark, I don't know what is.

You also do exactly what I mentioned in my previous post - refuse to back up any of your assertions.

I'm not trying to play you - I'm just tired of you essentially calling people know-nothings and then refusing to back up your comments with *any* facts whatsoever. The ball's in your court. I stand by what I said.