MozillaZine

Full Article Attached Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects

Thursday April 22nd, 1999

A recent Forbes article characterized Mozilla as a "flop". The article had so many inaccuracies that I felt a rebuttal was required. At the same time, I felt that some light needed to be shed on the differences between commercial Open Source projects and "all volunteer" Open Source projects. What follows (click "Full Article" below) is a rebuttal to the assertions in the Forbes article and my opinion on what can reasonably be expected from a commercial Open Source project.

As always, the opinions are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of mozilla.org (which MozillaZine is not affiliated with).


#8 Re:Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects

by P.B.

Thursday April 22nd, 1999 3:56 PM

You are replying to this message

There is one overriding way in which the forbes statement "mozilla is a flop", can be seen as absolutely, incontrovertibly true:

THERE IS NO STABLE SNAPSHOT!! And there doesn't seem to be any definate progress towards one, either.

Until that happens, mozilla is just a hobyists' toy. Completely beneath notice for people who are actually looking for a browser to USE.

mozilla is THE biggest argument AGAINST "open software is better". The official "netscape" browser is buggy, but it is so much LESS buggy than mozilla, it's shameful.