MozillaZine

Full Article Attached Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects

Thursday April 22nd, 1999

A recent Forbes article characterized Mozilla as a "flop". The article had so many inaccuracies that I felt a rebuttal was required. At the same time, I felt that some light needed to be shed on the differences between commercial Open Source projects and "all volunteer" Open Source projects. What follows (click "Full Article" below) is a rebuttal to the assertions in the Forbes article and my opinion on what can reasonably be expected from a commercial Open Source project.

As always, the opinions are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of mozilla.org (which MozillaZine is not affiliated with).


#23 Mozilla vs IE

by naaah

Friday April 23rd, 1999 8:50 AM

You are replying to this message

OKey, lets say IE get more users, and more support, despite its low-class -- We would still have an open-source browser. Thats much better than if just netscape continued in the old way, releasing buggy and big applications and loosing more and more to IE. Now we got a living and open project that hasn't got profit as it sole goal, we have alredy won!