Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects
Thursday April 22nd, 1999
A recent Forbes article characterized Mozilla as a "flop". The article had so many inaccuracies that I felt a rebuttal was required. At the same time, I felt that some light needed to be shed on the differences between commercial Open Source projects and "all volunteer" Open Source projects. What follows (click "Full Article" below) is a rebuttal to the assertions in the Forbes article and my opinion on what can reasonably be expected from a commercial Open Source project.
As always, the opinions are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of mozilla.org (which MozillaZine is not affiliated with).
#19 Re:Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects
by Bruce <email@example.com>
Friday April 23rd, 1999 7:47 AM
You are replying to this message
Can anybody here tell me what they think MS's strategy is by *not* producing a standards compliant browser? Especially since it is well known that Mozilla is doing a damn good job of supporting the standards.