Evaluating Commercial Open Source Projects
Thursday April 22nd, 1999
A recent Forbes article characterized Mozilla as a "flop". The article had so many inaccuracies that I felt a rebuttal was required. At the same time, I felt that some light needed to be shed on the differences between commercial Open Source projects and "all volunteer" Open Source projects. What follows (click "Full Article" below) is a rebuttal to the assertions in the Forbes article and my opinion on what can reasonably be expected from a commercial Open Source project.
As always, the opinions are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of mozilla.org (which MozillaZine is not affiliated with).
#13 Why talk shit?
Thursday April 22nd, 1999 11:01 PM
You are replying to this message
Why are some of you just so stupid?
Have you ever tried any pre-alpha software before?, well, they all are very buggy and not at all usefull unless you like to follow the development or contrubute.
And to say MoreCoders= Bad Code is just so crazy I don't know what to say, I suggest you read about the Cathedral and the Baazar and get a clue