RUS-CERT Criticizes Mozilla Security Bugs Policy
Thursday March 11th, 2004
Simon Paquet sent us a link to a German article from the Computer Emergency Response Team of the University of Stuttgart (RUS-CERT) that criticizes Mozilla's security policy.
Simon provides a translation of the key points of the article: "The RUS-CERT criticizes Mozilla's security approach to security leaks. They find fault in the fact that no official security advisories are published by the Mozilla Foundation. Instead security leaks are silently patched and incorporated into newer releases.
"They come to the conclusion, 'At the moment Mozilla is obviously no convincing alternative to the market leader [Microsoft].' In an update to their article, they state that this sentence was interpreted as saying that everyone should refrain from using Mozilla. This is not the case. They only state that Mozilla suffers from the same security problems as all other clients and that the use of Mozilla alone is no solution to those security problems."
Friday March 12th, 2004 5:01 PM
You are replying to this message
> In theory, all security bugs should be secret.
That's funny... e.g. look at bug 221526 and then look at <http://bonsai.mozilla.org…15&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot> As long as security checkins are publich and as long as they are called "Late-breaking security fix" you don't even need a script that automatically watches all checkins and alerts you when the respective bug report is not publicly visible.
(Ok, this has already been mentioned, but not that clearly.)