Firebird Poll Ignites Flames of Passion

Wednesday April 23rd, 2003

The question posed by our last poll was intended to get feedback on 'Firebird', the new name for Phoenix. We got it in buckets. A massive 20,576 people voted — that's over ten times as many as for the new Roadmap poll. The Firebird name is a sensitive issue and we strongly believe that certain parties made concerted efforts to fix the contest. Bearing that in mind, the results of the poll apparently suggest that 30% of voters love the new name, 6% like it, 4% are neutral towards it, 4% don't like it and 12% hate it. 29% of the votes cast were by people who think that should not have picked the same name as the Firebird database and 12% believe that the Mozilla suite should be renamed to Winnebago.

Our next poll will hopefully be less controversial. Tuesday marked the tenth anniversary of NCSA Mosaic, the revolutionary browser that is frequently credited with turbo-charging the growth of the Web. We want to know when you think the best period of post-Mosaic browser innovation took place. Was it immediately after the release of Mosaic, during which a crop of new graphical browsers hit the streets? Was it during in the Browser Wars, when Netscape and Microsoft battled for dominance of the Web? Maybe you think that we're currently in a browser innovation renaissance, with established companies like Apple re-entering the browser market. Let us know what you think and check the up-to-the-second results to follow the poll's progress.

#34 roadmap vs name

by warenhaus

Thursday April 24th, 2003 8:50 AM

You are replying to this message

as you can see in the forums, the roadmap is far from being understood by everyone. (they don't care to read.) a name change is catchy and everybody understands what it means (more or less). that explains why more pple are interested in it. reading this talkback, i see many Moz-users explaining their votes against the name (as i did). plus: kerz is a little bit exaggerating with the terms he uses like "stop at nothing" or "how far some people would go". multiple voting on a poll that doesn't take too much effort on preventing this is quite normal behaviour (well...), although i have to admit i only voted once, fully aware of the meaninglessness of my vote.