Reports on Phoenix/Minotaur Renaming Focus on Firebird Database Protest

Wednesday April 16th, 2003

InternetNews was one of the first sites to report on the renaming of Phoenix and Minotaur to Firebird and Thunderbird. Australian site LinuxWorld concentrated on the reaction from the Firebird database community, with claims that posts in "the Netscape-Mozilla newsgroup" (it's unclear exactly which newsgroup this refers to) are being censored. CNET also focussed on the controversy, including a link to a page from FirebirdSQL Foundation sponsor IBPhoenix that encourages people to join the "fray" and add to the "heat in [the MozillaZine] forums". The call-to-arms also lists the email addresses of many of the more prominent Mozilla contributors and suggests deluging them with messages (even though many of the listed people had nothing to do with the name change).

Posts to the forums about the name change should be kept polite and constructive and added to the existing name change announcement topic.

Update! The Firebird Admins have posted a statement about Phoenix's renaming to Firebird on their front page. Stating that they "strongly oppose this change", the announcement follows the earlier IBPhoenix article in asking its readers to declare their objections by posting to Mozilla community forums and emailing various Mozilla developers.

#54 Roasted Chicken!

by tuqui

Wednesday April 16th, 2003 10:25 PM

You are replying to this message

First I Love the Browser once know as Phoenix; I writing this using a 0.6nigthly. But the name change is a fail. If they think that Firebird Trademark make it safe is ridiculus. Is obvious that with a TradeMark the Original Firebird Database team couldn't do so much Legally they maybe don't have the money to hire lawers for this. But in the Open Source is the Legal part the most important?. Is not the cooperation between all the parts ( programers, designer, users, etc).