Performance Comparison of Mozilla 1.3 Beta and Safari v60

Friday February 14th, 2003

Mac bystander writes: "Interesting article comparing Mach-O Mozilla 1.3b on OS X to the new Safari beta. Sounds like the whole perf thing is not as clear-cut in that comparison as it is when comparing Safari to Chimera (off the 1.0 branch) or Netscape 7 (1.0 branch) on a broadband in-lab connection... ;)"

#32 further adventures in footprint

by marmoset

Saturday February 15th, 2003 9:14 PM

You are replying to this message

Safari: 45.2M 15.0M 52.5M 106M

Mozilla: 36.9M 20.9M 53.1M 270M

Looks like Mozilla renders it using considerably less RAM (Safari rendered it faster, though.) How is that page laid out (I'm literally afraid to view-source on it) is it a big table, or something else entirely?