Comparatively Speaking...

Monday July 1st, 2002

Linux Online recently compared the major Linux browsers, including the Mozilla-based trio of Mozilla 1.0, Netscape 6.2 and Galeon. Reviewer Michael J Jordan praises Mozilla's stability, tabbed browsing, rendering and customisation.

As mentioned by fondacio on our forums, the International Herald and Tribune took a look at Mozilla, Opera and NeoPlanet (note that the site doesn't seem to work in some builds of Mozilla). Reviewer Lee Dembart says that "Mozilla is impressive and has it all over Opera." He especially likes the ability to block pop-ups, tabbed browsing and pipelining.

UPDATE! tuxracer writes: "I've put up a browser comparison list, comparing various features that affect usability and W3C standards compliance. It compares Mozilla 1.0, Netcaptor 7.01, Internet Explorer 6.0 (Windows), and Internet Explorer 5.x (Mac)."

#83 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No

by asa <>

Sunday July 7th, 2002 10:03 PM

You are replying to this message

"That is the point. And thanks for help making it. ;) "

That a site could appear any day, or already exists and is exploiting users without my personal and specific knowledge supports your position that there are no threats to user systems and user data on the web?

"No argument there. ;)"

So you agree that there are risks to data security and system integrity on the web and in email?

(If we keep this going for another round or two the post title will be nothing but Re:Re:Re:Re...)