Comparatively Speaking...

Monday July 1st, 2002

Linux Online recently compared the major Linux browsers, including the Mozilla-based trio of Mozilla 1.0, Netscape 6.2 and Galeon. Reviewer Michael J Jordan praises Mozilla's stability, tabbed browsing, rendering and customisation.

As mentioned by fondacio on our forums, the International Herald and Tribune took a look at Mozilla, Opera and NeoPlanet (note that the site doesn't seem to work in some builds of Mozilla). Reviewer Lee Dembart says that "Mozilla is impressive and has it all over Opera." He especially likes the ability to block pop-ups, tabbed browsing and pipelining.

UPDATE! tuxracer writes: "I've put up a browser comparison list, comparing various features that affect usability and W3C standards compliance. It compares Mozilla 1.0, Netcaptor 7.01, Internet Explorer 6.0 (Windows), and Internet Explorer 5.x (Mac)."

#146 Legal profession

by SubtleRebel <>

Saturday July 13th, 2002 10:51 AM

You are replying to this message

I agree that your tactics are common in the legal profession, but aligning yourself with the legal profession really does not enhance your credibility.

It is common in the legal profession to distort reality in order to try to convince the jury to side with you.

It is common in the legal profession to misrepresent the facts and to try to twist quotes out of context in order to make it seem like the person said something different than what they actually said.

Those in the legal profession seldom use actual logic.

The legal profession ceased to be about truth and justice a long time ago; it is now about winning at any cost through manipulation and loopholes.

Unfortunately for you, this forum is more educated about the real facts of the case than a typical jury and so your tactics are not very effective here.