MozillaZine

Comparatively Speaking...

Monday July 1st, 2002

Linux Online recently compared the major Linux browsers, including the Mozilla-based trio of Mozilla 1.0, Netscape 6.2 and Galeon. Reviewer Michael J Jordan praises Mozilla's stability, tabbed browsing, rendering and customisation.

As mentioned by fondacio on our forums, the International Herald and Tribune took a look at Mozilla, Opera and NeoPlanet (note that the site doesn't seem to work in some builds of Mozilla). Reviewer Lee Dembart says that "Mozilla is impressive and has it all over Opera." He especially likes the ability to block pop-ups, tabbed browsing and pipelining.

UPDATE! tuxracer writes: "I've put up a browser comparison list, comparing various features that affect usability and W3C standards compliance. It compares Mozilla 1.0, Netcaptor 7.01, Internet Explorer 6.0 (Windows), and Internet Explorer 5.x (Mac)."


#127 Re: Re: Re: No

by kristen

Wednesday July 10th, 2002 7:37 PM

You are replying to this message

"I see, because it spreads via email _and_ the web that means I haven't satisfied your criteria for a threat to web browsers."

No, not at all. A worm/virus threat to a web surfer is not the same thing as the probability of a web surfer contracting a worm/virus via visiting a web page.

The 'nice logic' comes in with the rest of my prior post in its entirety. ;)