Tuesday January 8th, 2002
A few of you have asked for us to post a news item taking your suggestions for the site, so here it is. Tell us all your ideas for what we can do to improve the site. Anything you want we'll think about, but try to keep it realistic.
Just to keep you updated, one of the things we're planning on working on is getting the ChromeZone up again, if we can find some volunteer editors to help organize themes. If you're interested, please email me and I'll get back to you sometime this week.
UPDATE! Right now we're working on dumping all the tables and other old HTML within the site to both show off Mozilla's skills, and to get our file sizes smaller. If you're using Communicator to view the site, you'll notice everything looking pretty ugly, thanks to the poor CSS support it offers. If you're using IE, it'll look a bit better, but thanks to IE's lacking CSS2 support, the sidebar will show up incorrectly. We've completely redone the homepage and talkback code, and we'll be working on the forums next.
UPDATE 2! We discovered Google's great "Search Site" feature, and have added it. Right now it has most areas of the site indexed except news item talkback pages. It will start indexing talkback today, and will hopefully add all of the old items, in addition to picking up the new ones.
UPDATE 3! We've been working hard to get as many of your suggestions as possible implemented, and we encourage you to continue the feedback. You can check this article's responses for what items we have fixed, or are working on.
#131 Re: Re: Re: I actually pointed this out before the
Monday January 14th, 2002 7:51 PM
You are replying to this message
>I wont start to delve in what a lousy choice Mozilla is right now for the most common of users: The average Joe/Jane whom hardly know zilch about computers yet just want to get around the web.
You aren't one of those common users and I doubt you are a usability expert with any "most common of users" usability data on Mozilla or Mozilla derivatives like Netscape 6.x. In the absense of usability study data and in the absense of public comments from the "most common of users" (who tend not to comment very much in public) I go with the next best thing; the users who are just web smart enough to actually download and install software but still do it through C|net. They contradict your claim. <http://download.cnet.com/…?tag=st.dl.3364665.unav.0>