Weekend Discussion: Microsoft and 86%
Friday July 14th, 2000
There has been a lot of discussion about Microsoft's release of IE 5.5 recently, especially in regards to their support for standards such as CSS, DOM, and XML. Apparently Microsoft is developing new proprietary technologies at the expense of standards compliance in core web technologies.
With all this hoopla aimed at Microsoft, we shouldn't be letting Netscape off easy. I think it's time for Netscape to come out and state clearly where they expect to be in terms of standards compliance at version 6.0. If it is not the 100% that we had been told to expect, it's in their best interest to say why. Remember, Netscape 6.0 will have its own "behavior" implementation (XBL) that is, at this point, just as proprietary as Microsoft's DHTML behaviors (the dev team plans on submitting XBL to the W3C in the future).
And although Mozilla.org has not taken a position one way or another on Mozilla's standards compliance, it would be nice if they could weigh in and let the community know what they're thinking in terms of standards support in Mozilla's first release.
What do you think about standards support and compliance? Is it important? Or should the placation of existing customers be the priority? Let us know!
XBL and HTML is a relatively recent development... we're still not sure if it works completely as it should. IIRC the original intent was to allow for more rapid development of XUL widgets by exposing the anonymous content and script objects of elements to XML and JS.
XBL and HTML is an exciting prospect however. I believe XBL's syntax to be cleaner than HTC (and it's valid XML, too) I hope the W3 come to recognise the concept as more than just behavioural extensions to CSS - as a field of its own.