In what IRC network is the meeting taking place ?

but I think I might have a bug. I know this isn't the place for it but I lack the skill to post in Bugzilla. And I will be at work soon adn will be there for most of the day.

Use this as your CSS td { border-bottom : 2 solid Navy; border-left : 2 solid Navy;}

and then create a simple table with a border=0. Nothing shows up like it does shows up in IE, but make the border=1 and then it works, but then you get a nasty gray border.

Cheers.

On my personal Linux machine most of the M16 builds and M17 builds have been fairly stable. However I was working on a machine last week (Linux also) where mozilla was very unstable and crashed frequently.

I'd have like to have been able to produce a bug report for these crashes but were unable to as I was working at the time and I don't think my employer would have been too happy with me spending all my paid time on debugging a crash.

If there was Linux talkback builds of M16 then I would have been able to have provided at least some information to the mozilla team.

I'm happy :)

I got Mozilla running on Corel Linux. It only took me a couple weeks :) What I wouldn't give for an install program which works as easily as windows.

Mozilla is the first non-deb program I've actually managed to get installed on this computer.

Now to get the latest nightly...

Looks like another thumbs down for NS6 in this article. http://www.webdevelopersjournal.com/columns/ajs_n6_preview.html

Not that I care, but it seems that people expect Mozilla to solve the world's problems.

I disagree that the article was fairly reasoned. Why was the reviewer using a build from over two months ago?He apparently knew about the existence of milestones, and how to obtain them, since he mentioned M16 at one point...he even said that M16 showed an increase in speed...so why the heck wasn't he reviewing with that? I guess the argument is that M16 is a Mozilla build, not a Netscape build, and thus you can't review it as being NS 6 (doesn't have the promotional stuff, AIM, etc.) ... still, in that case, I believe the correct thing to do (from a journalistic standpoint) is to wait for PR2 and make judgments based on that. And he could have used M16 to evaluate the parsing and rendering capabilities, since those won't differ depending on comm. or non-comm. builds. This man obviously did not do his research: "There are very few differences between Netscape 6 and Mozilla's Gecko M16, with the obvious exception that Gecko works at about twice the speed." What is he basing this on? Does he give any support to this claim?

This reporter clearly wanted the more sensational angle...namely, to proclaim this as the downfall of Netscape. He also apparently took this opportunity to show off some 'witty' analogies (which got old quite fast). If he didn't know that little about software development and how much an open-source application can change over the course of a "few months," I question his position as managing editor of the Web Developer's Journal.

Here is a man who says he's been a fan of Netscape since day one, and has used NS 1 and every subsequent version. I don't believe this is the case...a true 'fan' would know a bit more about NS6 and Mozilla than this reviewer apparently does, and a true fan would not be so willing to drop a 5-year+ devotion to a company at the sight of a couple bugs. He says preview releases are allowed to have bugs, but not as many as PR1 had...how many alpha releases has this man reviewed in his life to be able to make a comparison?

My thoughts.