Remove copyright art from installer and Mozilla.org.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
Remove copyright art from installer and Mozilla.org.
Now that the questionably copyright art has been removed from the splash screen, are there bugs yet filed on removing it also from the installer and the Mozilla.org site? The dragon still appears in both of those places. It would be nice if we didn't have this "fractured" identity... (A few Bugzilla results pop up on a "copyright" query, but none of them pertaining to this.)
-
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Remove copyright art from installer and Mozilla.org.
JBassford wrote:Now that the questionably copyright art has been removed from the splash screen, are there bugs yet filed on removing it also from the installer and the Mozilla.org site? The dragon still appears in both of those places. It would be nice if we didn't have this "fractured" identity... (A few Bugzilla results pop up on a "copyright" query, but none of them pertaining to this.)
there's a bug for the installer - try searching for artwork instead of copyright (and if anyone else looks this up, please don't add comments saying that the new artwork sucks...)
no bug for the website art AFAIK, but bugzilla is a rather cumbersome way to coordinate changes to a webpage and it seems to get bypassed. there was discussion of reorganising the page in the minutes of the last mozilla staff meeting - maybe the banner will be changed then...
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
Re: Remove copyright art from installer and Mozilla.org.
michaell wrote:there's a bug for the installer - try searching for artwork instead of copyright
Got it, thanks.
- Levin
- Posts: 71
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 1:42 pm
- Location: Montréal
Removing artworks
Hi!
I did open the issue in this forum a while ago:
http://www.mozillazine.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6493
I did open the issue in this forum a while ago:
http://www.mozillazine.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6493
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 7:38 am
- Location: Opole (Poland, European Union)
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: November 8th, 2002, 8:37 am
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Contact:
Throbber
Then I take it you will also need to change the throbber.
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: November 8th, 2002, 8:37 am
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Contact:
Font
Is the font that is used for the Mozilla logo legal?
Just want to make sure.
Just want to make sure.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
Re: Font
moronicbajebus wrote:Is the font that is used for the Mozilla logo legal?
It's called the "Revolution" font, and the question was asked in the flash bug but no answer was forthcoming.
As for the throbber, yes, that would apply too. It seems to me that there are far too many areas still in existence with the old artwork that need to be changed. I'm not sure if this was all out thoroughly enough...
- amr
- Moderator
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: December 11th, 2002, 9:01 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
Hey...I just realized this all makes my Mozilla shirts either
1. Collectors items, or
2. Obsolete
Depending on which way you look at it.
1. Collectors items, or
2. Obsolete
Depending on which way you look at it.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
- Alex Bishop
- mozillaZine Admin
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 3:18 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Font
moronicbajebus wrote:Is the font that is used for the Mozilla logo legal?
The font is <a href="http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=401460">Revolution</a> from <a href="http://www.agfamonotype.com/">Agfa Monotype</a>. I'm not sure what sort of terms mozilla.org has licensed it under though.
Alex
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: November 8th, 2002, 8:37 am
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Contact:
Re: Font
Alex Bishop wrote:moronicbajebus wrote:Is the font that is used for the Mozilla logo legal?
The font is <a href="http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=401460">Revolution</a> from <a href="http://www.agfamonotype.com/">Agfa Monotype</a>. I'm not sure what sort of terms mozilla.org has licensed it under though.
http://www.fonts.com/legal/legal_home.a ... 6&con=eula
AGFA MONOTYPE CORPORATION END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT wrote: 12. You may electronically distribute Font Software embedded in a “Personal or Internal Business Use” document (that is, a document other than a “Commercial Product” as defined herein) only when the Font Software embedded in such document (i) is in a static graphic image (for example, a “gif”) or an embedded electronic document, and (ii) is distributed in a secure format that permits only the viewing and printing (and not the editing, altering, enhancing, or modifying) of such static graphic image or embedded document. You may not embed Font Software in a Commercial Product without a separate written license from AMT, and you may not embed Font Software in an electronic document or data file for any reason other than your own Personal or Internal Business Use.
It looks like if Mozilla bought it then they are fine; but I am not a lawyer.
- mesostinky
- Posts: 215
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 10:44 pm
- Location: NJ