0.6
- Touch-Money
- Posts: 108
- Joined: March 4th, 2003, 10:55 pm
- Location: Gilroy, CA & Mainz Germany
0.6
Ok so when is 0.6 coming out wasnt it supposed to be out in January and 0.7 supposed to be out in February? I love Phoenix I would just like to see these milestone releases actually be realsed.
- nilson
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: February 15th, 2003, 11:55 pm
- Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
- Contact:
Re: 0.6
Touch-Money wrote:Ok so when is 0.6 coming out wasnt it supposed to be out in January and 0.7 supposed to be out in February? I love Phoenix I would just like to see these milestone releases actually be realsed.
As would we all. Mozilla and Phoenix are behind schedule a bit, so the roadmaps are not accurate, as the dates have not been updated. 0.6 will be released when it is ready (blocker bugs gone, new name), and not before. If it were to be released before it was ready, it would, well, suck and none of us want that do we? I am not trying to be harsh, so dont take it that way.
Last edited by nilson on March 4th, 2003, 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Touch-Money
- Posts: 108
- Joined: March 4th, 2003, 10:55 pm
- Location: Gilroy, CA & Mainz Germany
- sensemann
- Posts: 755
- Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
- Location: Dresden, Germany
- Contact:
i bet TBFKAP (The browser formerly known as Phoenix) 0.6 will be out in March. In the last two weeks or so the number of bugs has come down from more than 40 to 25... and most of them aren't really serious ones like "Phx registeres as HTML Editor" or "Phx creates a Mozilla folder".. stuff like that.
Be prepared dude... be prepared
Be prepared dude... be prepared
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: November 15th, 2002, 4:14 am
- Location: Worcester, England
The window self-restoring on minimise
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163372
is a blocker, though
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163372
is a blocker, though
- Toxikk
- Posts: 159
- Joined: December 1st, 2002, 1:24 pm
prandal wrote:The window self-restoring on minimise
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163372
is a blocker, though
eww, nasty bug.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: November 16th, 2002, 9:31 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Roadmap updated
Its nice to see the roadmap being updated to reflect a March ETA for 0.6. does anyone know how close now (on 3/15).
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact:
Toxikk wrote:prandal wrote:The window self-restoring on minimise
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163372
is a blocker, though
eww, nasty bug.
Is this reproducible on NT/2000/XP as well, or is it only for 9x? If it affects only the 9x platform, then I wouldn't rush to call it a showstopper.
Kubuntu 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-25-generic) / KDE 3.5.10
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: March 14th, 2003, 10:18 am
daihard wrote:Toxikk wrote:prandal wrote:The window self-restoring on minimise
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163372
is a blocker, though
eww, nasty bug.
Is this reproducible on NT/2000/XP as well, or is it only for 9x? If it affects only the 9x platform, then I wouldn't rush to call it a showstopper.
Its very hard to reproduce atleast i've never been able to intentionally do it. However i've had it happen in winXP and in win2k.
It is so rare that it should definitly not stop a milestone release IMHO.
- daihard
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 16633
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 6:27 pm
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
- Contact:
pr0c wrote:daihard wrote:Is this reproducible on NT/2000/XP as well, or is it only for 9x? If it affects only the 9x platform, then I wouldn't rush to call it a showstopper.
Its very hard to reproduce atleast i've never been able to intentionally do it. However i've had it happen in winXP and in win2k.
It is so rare that it should definitly not stop a milestone release IMHO.
Thanks for the response. When a bug is very hard to repro, it's sure even harder to fix it. If it's such a rare occasion, I agree it shouldn't be a showstopper even though it's reproducible with NT/2000/XP.
Kubuntu 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-25-generic) / KDE 3.5.10
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
CentOS 4.8 (kernel 2.6.9-78.0.22.ELsmp) / KDE 3.5.10
Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) / iPhone 3GS (32GB black)
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: November 28th, 2002, 9:34 am
- Contact:
- ehume
- Posts: 6743
- Joined: November 17th, 2002, 12:33 pm
- Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
- Mgz
- Posts: 168
- Joined: November 25th, 2002, 6:14 pm
- Location: AB - Canada
I have never ever seen the minimization bug
--> you are so lucky =/
but it seems to me that Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030314 Phoenix/0.5 is free from this bug...
This bug is not always reproduce, sometimes it happens and sometime it doesn't (chance is 50/50 =/
--> you are so lucky =/
but it seems to me that Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030314 Phoenix/0.5 is free from this bug...
This bug is not always reproduce, sometimes it happens and sometime it doesn't (chance is 50/50 =/
Please forgive me for my poor English