Minutes of the mozilla.org Staff Meeting of Monday 5th April 2004
Saturday April 24th, 2004
By Gervase Markham
[Note: there was no staff meeting on 2004-04-12 due to Easter.]
Present: bart, leaf, blizzard, chofmann, mitchell, myk, dbaron, scc, gerv, ben.
Mozilla 1.7 final
- This will be the new stable branch
- Still talking 6/7 weeks and a couple of release candidates
- People are upset that the announcement wasn't made earlier
- That is, we didn't make official-sounding announcements in all the right places
- We are apologising, and committing to doing better in the future
- Need to split the roadmap into two parts — soon and future — and get the "soon" part out there [Correction from Mitchell Baker:
Not quite. I said that the roadmap had already been organized this way, we had the place to put the 1.7 info earlier, we just didn't do it.
]
- We need to find a good balance between doing the basic research and thinking, and communicating those things that have enough cohesion to be beyond the squishy stage.
Firefox 0.9
- Extension Manager UI is now working
- For the server side, Ben is writing a Java web service based on Tomcat, with MySQL back end
- DNS name will be update.mozilla.org
- Software update — notifications only — is on the plan for 1.0
- blake is working on an ActiveX control which runs in IE, to download and install Firefox more smoothly
Thunderbird 0.6
- Pinstripe has landed; that was the last 0.6 feature
- 12-15 bugs on the list
GRE
- Still a very long term plan
- This is really a post-Firefox-1.0 thing
Matters arising from the board meeting
- Mozilla Foundation matters
- Mitchell focused on management cohesion of the Foundation
Reorganising the newsgroup names
- Still running on Netscape's news server
- There has always been a plan to move to our own hardware
- But this requires resources we don't have right now
- Need an experienced newsgroup admin to set them up on our new hardware
Trademarks
- Trademark policy document in the works
Other
- Looking at current support options — improvement, higher visibility
- Google Answers?
Got a response? TalkBack!